Rank Group Warns Machine Games Duty Hike Could Force UK Casino and Bingo Hall Closures
Mia Hayes · Aug 27, 2026

Rank Group Warns Machine Games Duty Hike Could Force UK Casino and Bingo Hall Closures

Rank Group, the operator behind Grosvenor Casinos and Mecca Bingo, has cautioned that any rise in Machine Games Duty beyond its present 20% level, including proposals to double it to 40%, would place severe strain on the viability of its land-based sites and could trigger closures of bingo halls together with casinos throughout the UK, which in turn would reduce overall tax receipts for the government.
Company Financial Results Released
Company figures for the year ending June 2026 show gaming revenue climbing 5% to £835 million even as pre-tax profit declined 15% to £39 million, and these results arrived amid ongoing adjustments to the wider UK gambling tax framework that already include the remote gaming duty increase from 21% to 40% taking effect on April 1, 2026.
Observers note that land-based operators face different cost structures compared with online platforms, and Rank Group has highlighted how further duty changes on machines would compound existing pressures without delivering the intended revenue boost to the Treasury.
Tax Change Context and Industry Response
The remote gaming duty adjustment that came into force earlier in 2026 forms part of a sequence of fiscal measures affecting different segments of the gambling sector, and Rank Group has pointed out that land-based venues already operate under distinct regulatory and cost conditions that make additional machine tax increases particularly impactful.
Data from the company indicates that machine gaming contributes a substantial portion of revenue at both its casino and bingo operations, which means any duty increase would directly affect daily trading performance across hundreds of sites.
Potential Consequences for Venues and Tax Revenue
Rank Group has stated that higher Machine Games Duty would threaten the continued operation of multiple venues because margins on machine play would narrow sharply, and the company has suggested that some locations would no longer generate sufficient returns to cover fixed costs such as rent, staffing, and maintenance.
Those familiar with the sector recall that previous tax adjustments have sometimes led to reduced investment in physical sites, and Rank Group has warned that widespread closures would ultimately shrink the total tax take since fewer operating venues would mean lower overall economic activity and employment in the land-based gambling market.

Company statements emphasize that the proposed duty rise would apply uniformly without accounting for the higher overheads faced by physical venues compared with remote operators, and this distinction forms a central part of the argument presented to policymakers.
Broader Implications for UK Land-Based Gambling
Analysts tracking the industry have noted that Rank Group operates one of the largest portfolios of licensed land-based sites in the country, which gives its statements particular weight when discussions turn to potential tax policy changes scheduled for later in 2026.
Figures released alongside the annual results show that while revenue growth continued, profit compression has already begun to affect capital expenditure decisions, and further tax increases would accelerate that trend according to the company.
Rank Group has also referenced independent analysis on the effects of doubling Machine Games Duty, which suggests that such a move would reduce employment and investment in the sector without increasing net government receipts in the longer term.
Conclusion
The warning from Rank Group arrives at a moment when the UK gambling tax regime continues to evolve following the April 2026 remote duty change, and the company has made clear that its land-based operations remain sensitive to any further adjustments in Machine Games Duty rates. Company data and statements together illustrate the tension between revenue growth in some areas and margin pressure across the physical estate, while the potential for venue closures and reduced total tax contributions stands as the central concern raised in recent communications with stakeholders.